Up to $5,000 for qualifying unreimbursed losses
Submit third-party records for losses fairly traceable to the incident. The same expense cannot be reimbursed twice, and a self-prepared record alone is not sufficient.
Updated September 22, 2026
FinWise Bank, FinWise Bancorp, and American First Finance agreed to a proposed $2.8 million settlement resolving claims connected to a data incident on or about May 31, 2024. FinWise Bank is the bank entity the court describes as experiencing the incident. FinWise Bancorp is its related parent company. American First Finance is a consumer-finance technology company named as a defendant. The public preliminary approval order does not find that American First Finance's own systems were breached. The case is Minter v. FinWise Bank et al., No. 2:25-cv-00569-JNP-CMR, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Plaintiffs allege the defendants failed to protect private information and assert common-law and statutory claims. The defendants deny wrongdoing and liability. The court has not decided whether any defendant violated a law. It preliminarily approved the settlement and claims process on July 1, 2026, but final approval remains unresolved. The settlement class covers living people in the United States whose private information was affected, including people who received an incident notice. The preliminary approval order estimates a class of up to about 668,000 people. Other breach reports use a higher approximately 689,000 figure, but the court's estimate is the stronger source for settlement-class size. The potentially involved information may include names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and customer account numbers in some combination. A class member may choose either up to $5,000 for documented losses fairly traceable to the incident or a pro rata cash-fund payment without loss records. Those two payment paths are alternatives. Two years of three-bureau credit monitoring may be added to either one. Eligible California residents at the time of the incident may receive up to twice the ordinary cash-fund payment.
Submit third-party records for losses fairly traceable to the incident. The same expense cannot be reimbursed twice, and a self-prepared record alone is not sufficient.
This payment is an alternative to the documented-loss option. The amount is unknown and depends on approved claims and the net settlement fund.
Monitoring may be requested in addition to either the documented-loss option or the cash-fund option.
Eligible class members who lived in California when the incident occurred may receive up to two shares of the cash-fund payment. This does not double the $5,000 documented-loss ceiling.
The $2.8 million gross fund pays administration, taxes, court-approved fees, expenses, service awards, monitoring, and class payments. A claimant must choose either documented losses up to $5,000 or a pro rata cash-fund payment. Monitoring may be added to either choice. Documented-loss claims are paid before cash-fund payments under the notice's allocation structure. If approved documented losses exhaust the net fund, they may be reduced pro rata and no cash-fund payments may remain. No amount is guaranteed.
Official settlement site: FinWiseDataSettlement.com. Class Action Pulse is not the settlement administrator or a law firm — always verify eligibility, deadlines, and payout details through the official source above.
Check your eligibility and get help understanding your claim. It's free and takes under a minute.
No. The two payment paths are alternatives. You may add the two-year monitoring benefit to either payment choice.
The amount is not established. It depends on the net fund, the number and type of valid claims, and the amount paid for monitoring and documented losses.
Reasonable third-party documentation such as receipts, statements, or other records is required. A self-prepared or handwritten record alone is insufficient.
Eligible class members who resided in California at the time of the incident may receive up to twice the ordinary cash-fund payment. The provision does not increase the documented-loss cap.
No. The court preliminarily approved the settlement process but has not decided liability, negligence, damages, or whether any law was violated.
No payment date is guaranteed. Benefits depend on final approval and the settlement becoming final after any appeals or other review.
No. Class Action Pulse is not a law firm or settlement administrator and does not guarantee eligibility or payment. Epiq operates the official process.