Evidence boundary
Festival Fun Parks denies violating the law. The court has preliminarily approved a proposed settlement, not decided that the company is liable. Final approval and individual cash payments remain uncertain. The official claim deadline is November 24, 2026; filing an inquiry on this site does not submit that claim.
Overview
- Purchase period
- October 1, 2023 through June 12, 2025
- Claim deadline
- November 24, 2026
- Payment structure
- Proportional cash, not a fixed refund
Festival Fun Parks, LLC operates Lake Compounce, the Connecticut amusement and water park involved in this case. The dispute concerns electronic tickets purchased through lakecompounce.com and when an added processing fee was shown. It is not a lawsuit about ride safety, admission quality or every purchase at the park.
The official settlement website identifies a $500,000 proposed settlement. Qualifying website buyers can submit a claim for proportional cash, meaning a share determined under the allocation rather than a fixed refund. The fund also pays approved administration costs, legal fees and other authorized expenses. November 24 is the claim deadline and the deadline for exclusion or objection.
Who the parties are
Alexandria Linders is the named plaintiff and proposed class representative. She brought claims for herself and similarly situated ticket buyers. A class representative pursues the case for a defined group; that role does not make every member a separately named plaintiff.
Festival Fun Parks is the defendant and park operator. Lake Compounce is the consumer-facing park and ticket website identified in the agreement. Their relationship matters because buyers may recognize the park name rather than the legal entity. No additional named defendant is established in the reviewed settlement.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut supervises the case, number 3:25-cv-00659-SVN, before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. The agreement identifies Epiq as the settlement administrator, the company responsible for notices, claims and distributions rather than representing ticket buyers as their lawyer.
Bursor & Fisher, P.A. attorneys Philip L. Fraietta, Stefan Bogdanovich and Eleanor R. Grasso are identified as class counsel. Robinson & Cole LLP represents the defendant through Wystan M. Ackerman and Kevin P. Daly. Reardon Scanlon LLP attorney James J. Reardon, Jr. appears as local counsel for the plaintiff in the filed materials. These firms have different roles; an administrator inquiry is not legal representation.
What happened
The agreement records that Linders filed the proposed class action April 25, 2025. She alleged that processing fees were not disclosed before customers selected tickets, contrary to Connecticut General Statutes section 53-289a, called the Ticketing Statute in the case.
Festival Fun Parks moved July 24, 2025 to dismiss the case and compel arbitration. Dismissal would end claims at that stage; compelling arbitration would move the dispute to a private decision-maker under an asserted agreement. The settlement recitals say the court denied that motion March 6, 2026.
The company filed an answer March 27 denying liability and asserting defenses. It appealed April 3, and the court paused the action April 10 while the appeal was pending. The parties reached a settlement term sheet June 29, 2026. The current administrator site confirms preliminary approval and a December 8 final-approval hearing. This sequence does not establish that Linders won a trial.
What each side says
Linders alleges the company failed to show the processing fee before tickets were selected. Her position concerns the timing and completeness of price disclosure, not an assertion that all ticket fees are always prohibited. The agreement says she and class counsel believe the claims have merit but recognize litigation risks, expense and delay.
Festival Fun Parks denies wrongdoing, liability and fault. The agreement says it believes the claims lack merit and it could have prevailed, including in a dispute over certifying a litigation class. It agreed to compromise because of litigation uncertainty and expense. The settlement expressly is not an admission that the allegations are true.
What the court has and has not decided
Preliminary approval permits notice and settlement review to proceed. It is different from final approval, when the judge decides whether the compromise is fair, reasonable and adequate. Settlement-only class treatment does not establish that a class would necessarily have been certified for trial.
The notice says the court has not decided which side should win. The current record does not establish a final settlement judgment or approved individual payouts. The library item labeled Preliminary Approval actually contains the plaintiff's August 18 motion, not the signed approval order. This article relies on the administrator's current status without treating that motion as a judicial ruling.
Who may qualify
- Purchase channel and period: You bought tickets to Lake Compounce through lakecompounce.com from October 1, 2023 through June 12, 2025, inclusive.
- Fee certification: The class definition identifies website purchasers; the claim-form attestation requires that you paid a processing fee. Ask the administrator if your records are unclear.
- Excluded people and entities: Assigned judicial officers and immediate families or staff; appearing attorneys and immediate families; Festival Fun Parks, specified related or controlled entities, officers and directors; valid opt-outs; excluded persons' legal representatives, successors or assigns; and class counsel.
Section 1.39 of the agreement defines the class as individuals who purchased Lake Compounce tickets through the defendant's website from October 1, 2023 through June 12, 2025. The definition does not impose a Connecticut-residency requirement; the purchase channel and dates matter. Buying at another seller or outside that period does not meet this wording.
There is an important additional claim condition. The agreement's claim-form exhibit requires a sworn attestation that the buyer paid a processing fee with an eligible electronic-ticket purchase. The broader purchaser definition and this fee certification should be read together. Ask the administrator if your records show no fee or are incomplete; do not sign a statement you cannot truthfully make.
The exclusions cover the assigned judicial officer, immediate family and staff; appearing attorneys and their immediate families; specified defendant-related or controlled entities, officers and directors; class counsel; valid opt-outs; and excluded persons' legal representatives, successors or assigns. Being sent a notice does not override an applicable exclusion.
What affected readers can do now
Use the official website's claim process, not the eligibility form on Class Action Pulse. Its online login uses the unique ID and PIN supplied with notice. If those are missing, ask the administrator at 1-877-327-7930 or info@lakecompounceticketfeesettlement.com for instructions. A printable claim is available through the document library.
The agreement's form exhibit asks for contact information, a payment-method choice and an attestation under penalty of perjury, meaning knowingly false statements can have legal consequences. It does not request a routine receipt attachment. Keep purchase records anyway; the agreement permits audit, verification and requests for additional information. It gives a claimant 21 days from a deficiency notice to correct identified problems.
Submit online by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time November 24, 2026, or mail a paper claim postmarked by that date. Use the address on the current form. Retain your confirmation and notify the administrator of later contact changes.
What you could receive
A proportional payment
A valid, truthful, signed claim is required. Your amount depends on processing fees and the available fund after approved expenses; no dollar payment is guaranteed.
Earlier price disclosure or no added fees
The company agrees to maintain compliant website ticket flows while the relevant Connecticut law remains in force. This is not an extra claimant cash award.
Cash is paid proportionally according to processing fees and the available fund after approved deductions. The notice says the amount could be higher or lower than fees paid. Its numerical illustration is hypothetical, not a promised award. This article does not turn that example into an estimate.
Class counsel may request up to one-third of the fund for fees and costs, and Linders may request up to $5,000 as a service award. The judge can award less. A service award compensates the representative's case work; it is not a benefit every claimant receives. Administration and other court-approved expenses also reduce available cash.
Separately, the company agrees to maintain website purchase flows that either do not add ticket fees, or clearly disclose the total inclusive price before ticket selection, while the relevant statute remains in force. This future-practice relief can coexist with cash; it is not a second cash tier. Checks expire 180 days after issuance. Payment methods described in the notice include check, PayPal, Venmo and Zelle.
Important dates and rights
Claims, exclusion requests and objections share November 24, 2026 as the controlling deadline. Exclusion, often called opting out, gives up settlement benefits but preserves covered claims for separate pursuit. Use the notice's required personal signature and case-identification language, and submit online or mail as instructed.
An objection asks the court to reject or change the deal while you remain in the class. The notice requires filing with the court and copies to both sides' counsel, with detailed supporting information and November 24 mailing instructions. Follow its full requirements, not merely an email to the administrator.
A class member who does nothing gets no cash and, if the settlement becomes effective, releases covered claims anyway. The release includes known and unknown claims connected to electronic-ticket fees during the class period and specified related parties. Read agreement sections 1.32 through 1.34 and 3 before deciding.
Definitions and what happens next
The hearing is scheduled December 8, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom One, 450 Main Street, Hartford. Check official materials for changes and procedures if you want to speak. Attendance is not required to receive benefits. The notice says the fee request will be posted by November 10.
A non-reversionary fund generally does not return unused money to the defendant once the operative settlement is implemented; termination provisions are separate. Effective date means the agreement becomes operative after its required approval and finality conditions. Appeals can delay that point. Payments therefore are not promised on the hearing date. The administrator will process claims under the approved terms, with any later distribution governed by the agreement.
Sources and evidence boundaries
The official site and court-authorized notice support current deadlines. The agreement supports class exclusions, fee certification, allocation, release and chronology. Its claim-form exhibit was checked in the filed agreement when the standalone form was unavailable. No fixed individual recovery is calculated.
Class Action Pulse is not a law firm or settlement administrator and does not guarantee eligibility or payment. This article is general information, not legal advice. Follow the official notice, agreement, current claim form and court instructions.
Frequently asked questions
Do I receive exactly the processing fee I paid?
Not necessarily. Payments are proportional and depend on the allocation and available funds. The official notice says a payment could be higher or lower than the fees paid.
Do I need to upload a receipt?
The agreement's claim-form exhibit asks for contact and payment information and a signed fee-purchase attestation, not a routine receipt attachment. Claims remain subject to audit, verification and requests for more information.
Can I opt out and receive cash?
No. A valid exclusion preserves the ability to pursue covered claims separately but removes you from settlement benefits.
Does doing nothing preserve my lawsuit rights?
No. A class member who does not validly opt out receives no cash without a claim and is bound by the covered release if the settlement becomes effective.
