Up to $5,000 for documented losses
Reimbursement for reasonable, unreimbursed losses connected to the incident. Supporting records are required, and the administrator may request more information.
Updated September 19, 2026
A proposed $3.1 million settlement would resolve claims arising from unauthorized access to or acquisition of private information in Palomar Health Medical Group's computer systems between April 23 and May 5, 2024. Palomar Health Medical Group is the outpatient medical group aligned with the Palomar Health system and provides primary and specialty care in North San Diego County and nearby communities. Patients typically interact with it through physician visits, specialty services, scheduling, billing, and medical records. That relationship matters because the disputed incident involved information maintained in the medical group's systems. The case is Castro et al. v. Arch Health Partners, Inc. d/b/a Palomar Health Medical Group, Case No. 37-2024-00024339-CU-NP-CTL, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Clarissa Castro, Amber Friedrich, Duncan Meadows, John South, and Nyree Zapata are the class representatives. They brought the action for people with similar alleged injuries. The notice says plaintiffs allege Palomar Health is legally responsible for the incident. Palomar Health denies the claims, wrongdoing, and liability. The court has not decided which side is right. It has authorized notice and preliminarily allowed the settlement process to proceed, but it has not granted final approval or found that Palomar Health violated the law. The settlement class generally includes individuals whose private information was accessed, acquired, disclosed, or compromised in connection with the incident. People sent settlement notice by mail are eligible to submit a claim, subject to the formal class definition and exclusions. A valid claim may request either up to $5,000 for documented incident-related losses or an alternative cash payment estimated at $60. Either cash choice may be combined with two years of single-bureau credit monitoring, identity-fraud insurance, and dark-web monitoring. The $60 figure is only an estimate. Cash awards may increase or decrease on a pro rata basis after claims, administration costs, court-approved fees, and service awards are accounted for. "Pro rata" means the available net fund is divided according to the settlement's rules rather than guaranteeing every claimant a fixed amount. Claims must be submitted online or postmarked by October 22, 2026. The deadline to opt out or object is October 7, 2026. Opting out preserves the ability to pursue the released claims separately but gives up settlement benefits. Remaining in the class, even without filing a claim, means the person will be bound by the release if the settlement becomes final. The final approval hearing is scheduled for November 6, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. No payment is guaranteed, and distribution cannot begin unless the court grants final approval and any appeals are resolved.
Reimbursement for reasonable, unreimbursed losses connected to the incident. Supporting records are required, and the administrator may request more information.
No loss documentation is required. The amount is estimated, not guaranteed, and may be adjusted pro rata based on valid claims and the remaining net fund.
May be claimed with either cash option or by itself. Includes single-bureau credit monitoring, $1 million in identity-fraud insurance, and dark-web monitoring.
A class member may choose one cash path. Cash Payment A reimburses up to $5,000 in reasonable, documented losses related to the incident. The claimant must attest under penalty of perjury and provide records such as receipts, correspondence, or telephone records. A personal statement may explain other records but generally is not enough by itself. Cash Payment B is an estimated $60 alternative that requires no loss documents. The final alternative payment may rise or fall based on valid claims and the net fund. Either cash path may be combined with two years of single-bureau credit monitoring, $1 million in identity-fraud insurance, and dark-web monitoring. Claimants cannot receive both cash choices. The notice also describes security enhancements Palomar Health says it implemented outside the settlement fund, including endpoint detection, backup storage, and added network monitoring.
Official settlement site: PHMGDataSettlement.com. Class Action Pulse is not the settlement administrator or a law firm — always verify eligibility, deadlines, and payout details through the official source above.
Check your eligibility and get help understanding your claim. It's free and takes under a minute.
The proposed settlement concerns a cybersecurity incident involving Palomar Health Medical Group systems between April 23 and May 5, 2024. Plaintiffs allege the medical group is liable for the incident. Palomar Health denies wrongdoing and liability.
No. The court has not decided which side is right. Preliminary approval permits notice, claims, objections, exclusions, and a final approval hearing. It is not a liability finding.
No. A claimant chooses either documented-loss reimbursement up to $5,000 or the estimated $60 alternative payment. Credit monitoring may be added to either option.
The alternative cash option requires no loss documentation. The documented-loss option requires reasonable records supporting incident-related, unreimbursed expenses.
You will receive no settlement benefit. If the settlement becomes final, you will still be bound by the release unless you validly opted out by October 7, 2026.
No distribution date is guaranteed. The court will consider final approval on November 6, 2026. Payments can follow only after approval, appeals, and claim review.
No. Class Action Pulse is not a law firm or settlement administrator and does not guarantee eligibility or payment. Use PHMGDataSettlement.com for the official claim.